NONCUSTODIAL PARENTS --- You allege that you were classified by some government process, whether by 'family court' or another method, as a 'noncustodial' parent, and that your superior and natural rights, over government, to one (1) or more of your own children were unlawfully removed or prevented by government, and/or unequally divided away from you, to the majority favor of the child(ren)'s other parent(s), because the government process against you never *first* bothered to find you *seriously* abusive or neglectful or dangerous to any children, in a court of full due process protections, and by 'clear and convincing evidence' (i.e., with the kind of very serious evidence, and because of actual *serious* danger or wrong(s) done to children, to the level where the State could press criminal charges against you and reasonably expect to win, even in an honest court, without much difficulty).

Obviously, in most divorce and similar cases involving custody of children, actual hard allegations of very serious types of real parental unfitness never arise, at all, in the first place. That accounts for the legal reason why the vast majority of all [state - county] child custody "awards" are flatly unconstitutional, as a matter of law to begin with, since every parent already has/had fully vested and complete legal custody rights over every aspect of their own natural child, from the very moment of live birth, automatically - and, that includes both mother and father, in equal shares, with full rights of survivorship. The [state - county] judge or other government administrator cannot legally, actually, give away or "award" something it does not have, and never did.. the actual, legal custody of a child (except for the rarer situations, such as juvenile delinquency actions where the government proved the serious delinquency, and so therefore lawfully took over custody and control of the child). And, of course, equal protection of the law demands fair and equal treatment in all matters, even child custody matters in divorce and similar situations, or more precisely, even to the fair and equal division of all parenting time, expenses, responsibilities and duties regarding the lives of children, divided fairly and equally between the two parents, regardless of whether or not the parents are married or not.

By numerous binding rulings of the United States Supreme Court over past decades, that [state - county] judge or other government administrator was required to find very serious abuse, neglect, or form of danger to children, by very serious evidence, under a full due process defense for either or both parent(s).. first.. that's first... before it could even begin to *consider* taking away the equal share of pre-existing child custody rights that both natural parents enjoyed from the instant moment of the child's live birth.. i.e., before taking away those rights from *either* parent.

Of course, before the government can take away your pre-existing rights, they are required to properly notify you (prior..) that you might be jeopardizing that right, when it is a Constitutional Right, such as retaining your superior and existing child custody rights, which time and time again, the United States Supreme Court has ruled are *higher* than mere Constitutional Rights.. It does not matter that your attorney, if any, failed to advise you that you already had custody of your child, legally, from the very moment of his or her birth.. although that is good cause for an attorney malpractice suit.. Legally (the real law, under your real rights in this Nation, which is a "Republic", by the way, and not really a "Democracy" under the actual definition..), the judge or other government administrator responsible must have told you, up front, that you *already had* custody of your child, just like any other parent does already from the moment of birth, and that the real purpose of the 'family court' or other proceeding was to simply defraud you from one of your most basic, instinctive, and protected rights - the right to your child(ren) - by simply ignoring your pre-existing rights.. especially if you didn't know any better..

In other words, under the Noncustodial Parent legal standing in this federal classaction lawsuit, you are alleging that you were wrongfully deprived and/or defrauded from part or all of the various rights, time, control, and other life aspects of your child(ren), that you were never told the actual and full truth of your pre-existing legal rights and defenses to your children, and that your due process was therefore violated by government in one or more way(s).