CHILD PROTECTION SERVICES --- You allege that you either are now, or were previously, a *parent* victim of unlawfully having your child(ren) removed by any form of Child Protection Services (regardless of the actual agency name that is used by the government in your State), and your child(ren) were either taken temporarily or permanently.
 
You allege that your superior and natural rights, over government, to your child(ren) was/were unlawfully removed or prevented by government, because the government process against you never *first* bothered to find you *seriously* abusive or neglectful or dangerous to any children, in a court of full due process protections, and by 'clear and convincing evidence' (i.e., with the kind of very serious evidence, and because of actual *serious* danger or wrong(s) done to children, to the level where the State could press criminal charges against you and reasonably expect to win, even in an honest court, without much difficulty).
 
By numerous binding rulings of the United States Supreme Court over past decades, your [state - county] judge or other government administrator of your removal action was required to find very serious abuse, neglect, or form of danger to one or more children, by very serious evidence, under a full due process defense for either or both parent(s).. first.. that's first... before it could even begin to *consider* taking away the pre-existing child custody rights that both natural parents enjoyed from the instant moment of the child's live birth.. i.e., before taking away those rights from *either* parent, because the other parent's rights to your child(ren), if applied properly, also protect you, and the child(ren).
 
Of course, before the government can take away your pre-existing rights, they are required to properly notify you (prior..) that you might be jeopardizing that right, when it is a Constitutional Right, such as retaining your superior and existing child custody rights, which time and time again, the United States Supreme Court has ruled are *higher* than mere Constitutional Rights.. It does not matter that your attorney, if any, failed to advise you that you already had custody of your child, legally, from the very moment of his or her birth.. although that is good cause for an attorney malpractice suit.. Legally (the real law, under your real rights in this Nation, which is a "Republic", by the way, and not really a "Democracy" under the actual definition..), the judge or other government administrator responsible must have told you, up front, that you *already had* custody of your child, just like any other parent does already from the moment of birth, and that the real purpose of the 'legal' removal proceeding was to simply defraud you from one of your most basic, instinctive, and protected rights - the right to your child(ren) - by simply ignoring your pre-existing rights.. especially if you didn't know any better..
 
In other words, under the CPS Victim Parent legal standing (and, for the most part, also under the Opposite Parent legal standing) in this federal classaction lawsuit, you are alleging that you were wrongfully deprived and/or defrauded from part or all of the various rights, time, control, and other life aspects of your child(ren), that you were never told the actual and full truth of your pre-existing legal rights and defenses to your children, and that your due process was therefore violated by government in one or more way(s).
 
You may also review both the various CPS Victim Parent and Opposite Parent "multiple-check checkboxes" (not the one-choice-only radio buttons) for additional examples of how the state's child custody determination process is unconstitutionally violated.
 
YOU MAY CLOSE THIS WINDOW IF DONE